🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he might agree to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Responsibility for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.